Wow, I mean wow. If you had told me at the beginning of the season that I would be sitting her toasting the second Clarkson national championship in my lifetime, I don’t know what I would have said. I think I picked the Knights to finish fourth in the ECAC heading into the season. I thought the departures of Erin Ambrose and Renata Fast would hurt them a lot more than they did. Who knows, if this team doesn’t lose to BC in overtime last year, maybe we’re talking about three NCAA championships in four years.
If I were to contrast Clarkson and Wisconsin, it looked to me like Wisconsin was just going to play their game and dare you to beat them. What Clarkson found, what Katie Crowley largely unlocked for them, was that if you could adjust to neutralize the Badgers’ strengths, they wouldn’t adjust, they would just assume they were good enough to beat you anyway. (Or that you couldn’t neutralize those strengths for a full sixty minutes.)
Because of course they are. Before you read the opinions of me (or any other dude), I recommend checking out the pieces below and maybe giving them a follow on Twitter.
U.S. women’s hockey team threatens to not play in world championships
by Julie Foudy, ESPNW
U.S. women’s hockey team willing to risk everything for respect
by Johnette Howard, ESPNW
Team USA boycott of IIHF Worlds about “more than hockey”
by Hannah Bevis, The Ice Garden
Who Do You Pay For: USA Hockey and the Undervaluing of Women Athletes
by Beth Boyle Machlan, The Ice Garden
Here’s the timeline on USWNT’s decision to sit out IIHF World Championships
by Erica L. Ayala and Hannah Bevis, The Ice Garden
US Women’s National Team Demands Better from USA Hockey
by Zoë Hayden, Victory Press
The U.S. women’s hockey team is boycotting over unfair wages. Here’s why that’s the right thing to do.
by Hemal Jhaveri, For the Win, USA Today
The U.S. Women’s Hockey Team’s Boycott Is About More Than Money
by Jaya Saxena, Elle
Due to discrimination by USA Hockey, women’s team boycotts world championship
by Lindsay Gibbs, Think Progress
U.S. Women’s Hockey Team Boycotting World Championships To Protest Low Pay
by Camila Domonoske, NPR
U.S. Women’s Hockey Team Boycott Echoes a Fight That Isn’t Over
by Juliet Macur, New York Times
Why the U.S. women’s hockey team is boycotting the world championships
by Christina Rutherford, Sportsnet
U.S. Women’s Hockey Team To Boycott World Championships Unless USA Hockey Steps Up Support
by Laura Wagner, Deadspin
If you haven’t seen by now, the US women’s team will be boycotting the IIHF World Championships later on in March. Though the above article mentions equal pay, the women are seeking “equitable support” (fair support) via the portion of their statement released here.
The conference tournaments concluded last weekend with a fairly predictable selection process. The only real question was whether the committee would extra, super penny-pinch and have Clarkson and St. Lawrence play one another, but it didn’t come to pass. What we are left with is perfect bracket integrity. In fact, not only is the bracket perfect, but Robert Morris, the CHA champion, is also the eighth-ranked team in the PairWise. The system works!
The ECAC quarterfinals progressed rather quietly with all four top seeds winning their series. Only Princeton needed the extra game to do so.
The Hockey East quarterfinals are best of three series played at the home school of the top seeds. The semifinals and finals are single-elimination games played at a predetermined site. This year’s tournament will be played in Boston at Boston University.
The ECAC quarterfinals are best of three series played at the home school of the top seeds. The semifinals and finals are single-elimination games played at the site of the conference’s regular season Champion, Clarkson, the following weekend.
Posted in Conference Tournaments, ECAC
Tagged clarkson, colgate, cornell, ecac tournament, princeton, Quinnipiac, rensselaer, RPI, slu, st lawrence, yale